<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Way The Dock Was Supposed To Be</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leopardtricks.com/leopard/the-way-the-dock-was-supposed-to-be/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leopardtricks.com/leopard/the-way-the-dock-was-supposed-to-be</link>
	<description>Tips and Tricks for Apple&#039;s Leopard operating system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:05:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.leopardtricks.com/leopard/the-way-the-dock-was-supposed-to-be/comment-page-1#comment-447</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leopardtricks.com/leopard/the-way-the-dock-was-supposed-to-be#comment-447</guid>
		<description>David, that&#039;s nowhere near as cool, compared to what this is.

BTW, the guy on that website said that there was some problems with it, so maybe that&#039;s why it was removed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, that&#8217;s nowhere near as cool, compared to what this is.</p>
<p>BTW, the guy on that website said that there was some problems with it, so maybe that&#8217;s why it was removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David PJ</title>
		<link>http://www.leopardtricks.com/leopard/the-way-the-dock-was-supposed-to-be/comment-page-1#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>David PJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leopardtricks.com/leopard/the-way-the-dock-was-supposed-to-be#comment-446</guid>
		<description>Have you tried dropping your applications folder into the dock? Very easy way o find application. Pretty cool too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried dropping your applications folder into the dock? Very easy way o find application. Pretty cool too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.leopardtricks.com/leopard/the-way-the-dock-was-supposed-to-be/comment-page-1#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leopardtricks.com/leopard/the-way-the-dock-was-supposed-to-be#comment-444</guid>
		<description>Maybe both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://www.leopardtricks.com/leopard/the-way-the-dock-was-supposed-to-be/comment-page-1#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 03:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leopardtricks.com/leopard/the-way-the-dock-was-supposed-to-be#comment-439</guid>
		<description>Maybe we should address the reasons that Apple ended up leaving it out.  Was it to leave as a meaningful feature update?  Or was the app stack actually causing stability issues or performance problems?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe we should address the reasons that Apple ended up leaving it out.  Was it to leave as a meaningful feature update?  Or was the app stack actually causing stability issues or performance problems?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.leopardtricks.com/leopard/the-way-the-dock-was-supposed-to-be/comment-page-1#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leopardtricks.com/leopard/the-way-the-dock-was-supposed-to-be#comment-437</guid>
		<description>Wow, that&#039;s amazing. Hopefully it will be in 10.5.2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that&#8217;s amazing. Hopefully it will be in 10.5.2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

